AsiaBIS Research Guide · Draft for review

Set the supplier due diligence scope before ordering research

Turn your purchasing decision into a focused brief with defined subjects, evidence needs, and useful limits.

The research question

Two suppliers with similar company sizes may require different research. One will provide replaceable office supplies; the other will manufacture a critical component or represent your business with customers. Start by describing the relationship and the decision. Then decide which questions a research assignment must answer.

Write the decision in one sentence

Use a concrete statement such as: 'We need to decide whether to appoint this company as our local distributor for the proposed territory.' Add the contemplated activities, commercial exposure, and any known concern. This gives the researcher a purpose against which to test the proposed scope.

The OECD frames responsible-business-conduct due diligence as a risk-based process addressing actual and potential adverse impacts across operations, supply chains, and business relationships. Its focus includes impacts on people and the environment; it is broader than a commercial background report. That distinction helps buyers recognise when additional specialist assessment is needed. OECD due diligence overview

Separate identity, conduct, finances, and operations

Give each workstream a question. Identity research asks which legal entity you are dealing with. Background research asks what relevant information is available about its history and conduct. Financial research addresses specified financial questions. Operational verification tests particular claims about facilities or activities.

Do not assume that one report answers all four equally. Ask for a scope table showing included checks, source limits, delivery time, and any work that requires a separate instruction. If a check is unlikely to produce useful evidence, ask what alternative would better address the underlying question.

Choose the subjects deliberately

Hypothetical example: a manufacturer is considering a distributor introduced by its founder. The manufacturer needs company research and also wants to understand the founder's relevant background. It names the company and the individual separately, supplies the necessary identifiers, and confirms both in the order. It does not assume that a company report automatically screens everyone named in corporate records.

At AsiaBIS, Standard company screening covers the company. Associated individual checks can be added separately. This keeps the research subjects visible and gives the buyer a clear record of who was and was not screened.

Decide what happens when evidence is limited

Before ordering, agree how unavailable records, uncertain matches, and unsuccessful enquiries will be reported. Request an explanation of limitations alongside the findings. A missing result should remain distinguishable from a negative finding.

End the brief with the required output and decision date. Specify whether you need an online view, an editable report for a client deliverable, or findings on a narrowly defined field assignment. Format matters, but it should follow the research need. The most useful scope is the one that resolves material questions within a clearly understood boundary.

What to take away

  • Describe the business decision before selecting a report tier.
  • Separate company checks from checks on associated people.
  • Agree evidence limits and the treatment of unresolved questions in advance.
REFERENCES & FURTHER READING
YOUR NEXT STEP
Share this briefing

This AsiaBIS briefing is provided for general business-information purposes only. It does not constitute legal, financial, investment, compliance, or other professional advice and should not be relied upon as the sole basis for a business decision. Public records, regulatory requirements, ownership information, and operating circumstances may change after publication. Readers should verify current information with the relevant authority and obtain advice from appropriately qualified local counsel or other professional advisers where needed. Publicly available sources may also be incomplete, delayed, or contain errors, and all findings should be considered in light of the stated scope and limitations.