AsiaBIS Research Guide · Draft for review

Registered shareholders and beneficial owners: what your ownership chart should show

Build an ownership chart that distinguishes documented shareholdings, control questions, and unresolved links.

The research question

An ownership chart should make the evidence easier to inspect. Its value comes from showing which links are documented and where the chain remains incomplete. Before commissioning ownership research, decide whether you need the immediate registered shareholders, the people ultimately connected through ownership or control, or both.

Distinguish the question from the first available record

FATF's beneficial-ownership guidance emphasises adequate, accurate, and current information about the true owners of legal persons. It supports combining information from companies, registries, and other mechanisms rather than depending on a single source. For a buyer, the practical lesson is to ask what each source establishes and what additional evidence is needed. FATF guidance

Your initial registry record may identify another company as a shareholder. Preserve that finding exactly. Do not replace the company with a presumed individual owner merely to complete the picture. Add a separate research question for the next entity and distinguish a documented ownership link from an assertion about control.

Give every connection a source and date

For each link, record the two entities or people involved, the relationship described, any percentage disclosed, the effective date if known, and the source date. Use explicit labels such as 'registry record', 'company-provided declaration', and 'not independently corroborated'. A visual line without those details can look more certain than the evidence allows.

Ask the subject for an explanation of gaps and request relevant supporting material within the agreed research scope. Treat a different date as a possible explanation for conflicting records before calling the records inconsistent. When multiple share classes or control arrangements appear, record them for appropriate specialist review rather than forcing them into a single percentage.

Use uncertainty visibly

Hypothetical example: the first record shows that Holding Company A owns the subject. A company-provided chart names two individuals above Holding Company A, but no supporting records have yet been obtained. The report shows the verified first link and labels the second layer as declared and uncorroborated. It identifies exactly what would be needed to strengthen that layer.

An incomplete chart is still useful when the limitation is precise. 'Ultimate ownership not established from accessible material' describes the result. It does not mean ownership is absent, or establish that somebody is deliberately hiding it.

Agree the depth before research begins

Specify which jurisdictions and entities the assignment covers, whether historic changes matter, and which associated people require separate screening. At AsiaBIS, a Standard company check screens the company; associated individual checks are additions to that scope. Finding a person's name in the ownership record should not be mistaken for having completed a background check on that person.

What to take away

  • Distinguish immediate shareholder records from conclusions about ultimate ownership or control.
  • Attach a source and date to each chart connection.
  • Keep associated-person screening explicit in the research scope.
REFERENCES & FURTHER READING
YOUR NEXT STEP
Share this briefing

This AsiaBIS briefing is provided for general business-information purposes only. It does not constitute legal, financial, investment, compliance, or other professional advice and should not be relied upon as the sole basis for a business decision. Public records, regulatory requirements, ownership information, and operating circumstances may change after publication. Readers should verify current information with the relevant authority and obtain advice from appropriately qualified local counsel or other professional advisers where needed. Publicly available sources may also be incomplete, delayed, or contain errors, and all findings should be considered in light of the stated scope and limitations.